PSI Structural Biology Knowledgebase

PSI | Structural Biology Knowledgebase
Header Icons

Related Articles
Community-Nominated Targets
July 2015
Drug Discovery: Solving the Structure of an Anti-hypertension Drug Target
July 2015
Retrospective: 7,000 Structures Closer to Understanding Biology
July 2015
Design and Evolution: Unveiling Translocator Proteins
June 2015
Signaling with DivL
May 2015
Signaling: A Platform for Opposing Functions
May 2015
Signaling: Securing Lipid-Protein Partnership
May 2015
Dynamic DnaK
March 2015
Iron-Sulfur Cluster Biosynthesis
December 2014
Mitochondrion: Flipping for UCP2
December 2014
Mitochondrion: Setting a New TRAP1
December 2014
Power in Numbers
August 2014
Quorum Sensing: A Groovy New Component
August 2014
Quorum Sensing: E. coli Gets Involved
August 2014
iTRAQing the Ubiquitinome
July 2014
Microbiome: The Dynamics of Infection
September 2013
Protein-Nucleic Acid Interaction: A Modified SAM to Modify tRNA
July 2013
Protein-Nucleic Acid Interaction: Versatile Glutamate
July 2013
PDZ Domains
April 2013
Alpha-Catenin Connections
March 2013
Cell-Cell Interaction: A FERM Connection
March 2013
Cell-Cell Interaction: Magic Structure from Microcrystals
March 2013
Cell-Cell Interaction: Modulating Self Recognition Affinity
March 2013
Bacterial Hemophores
January 2013
Archaeal Lipids
December 2012
Membrane Proteome: Capturing Multiple Conformations
December 2012
Lethal Tendencies
October 2012
Symmetry from Asymmetry
October 2012
A signal sensing switch
September 2012
Regulatory insights
September 2012
AlkB Homologs
August 2012
Budding ensemble
August 2012
Targeting Enzyme Function with Structural Genomics
July 2012
The machines behind the spindle assembly checkpoint
June 2012
Chaperone interactions
April 2012
Pilus Assembly Protein TadZ
April 2012
Revealing the Nuclear Pore Complex
March 2012
Topping off the proteasome
March 2012
Twist to open
March 2012
Disordered Proteins
February 2012
Analyzing an allergen
January 2012
Making Lipopolysaccharide
January 2012
Pulling on loose ends
January 2012
Terminal activation
December 2011
The Perils of Protein Secretion
November 2011
Bacterial Armor
October 2011
TLR4 regulation: heads or tails?
October 2011
Ribose production on demand
September 2011
Moving some metal
August 2011
Looking for lipids
July 2011
Ribofuranosyl Binding Protein
June 2011
A molecular switch for neuronal growth
May 2011
Cell wall recycler
May 2011
Added benefits
April 2011
NMR challenges current protein hydration dogma
March 2011
Nitrile Reductase QueF
March 2011
Tip formin
March 2011
Inhibiting factor
February 2011
PASK staying active
February 2011
Tryptophanyl-tRNA Synthetase
February 2011
Regulating nitrogen assimilation
January 2011
Subtle shifts
January 2011
December 2010
Function following form
October 2010
tRNA Isopentenyltransferase MiaA
August 2010
Importance of extension for integrin
June 2010
April 2010
Alg13 Subunit of N-Acetylglucosamine Transferase
February 2010
Hemolysin BL
January 2010
December 2009
Two-component signaling
December 2009
Network coverage
November 2009
Pseudouridine Synthase TruA
November 2009
Unusual cell division
October 2009
Toxin-antitoxin VapBC-5
September 2009
Salicylic Acid Binding Protein 2
August 2009
Proofreading RNA
July 2009
Ykul structure solves bacterial signaling puzzle
July 2009
Hda and DNA Replication
June 2009
Controlling p53
May 2009
Mitotic checkpoint control
May 2009
Ribonuclease and Ribonuclease Inhibitor
April 2009
The elusive helicase
April 2009
March 2009
High-energy storage system
February 2009
A new class of bacterial E3 ubiquitination enzymes
January 2009
Poly(A) RNA recognition
January 2009
Activating BAX
December 2008
Scavenger Decapping Enzyme DcpS
November 2008
Bacteriophage Lambda cII Protein
October 2008
New metal-binding domain
October 2008
Blocking AmtB
September 2008
September 2008
Aspartate Dehydrogenase
August 2008
RNase T
July 2008
May 2008

Research Themes Cell biology

Proofreading RNA

PSI-SGKB [doi:10.1038/fa_psisgkb.2009.28]
Featured Article - July 2009
Short description: The structure of RNA polymerase II caught in the 'backtracked' state reveals how it ensures faithful transcription.Science 324, 1203-1206 (2009)

The three states of the RNA polymerase II elongation complex. The dashed oval represents the empty nucleotide addition site.

RNA polymerases catalyze rapid RNA chain growth. RNA polymerase II adds between 20 and 70 nucleotides per second to RNA and does this by moving forwards and backwards over at template at each step. Transcribing RNA polymerases swap between three states: pre-translocated, reverse-translocated and post-translocated. Structures of the pre- and post-translocated states are available, but that of the intermediate step – reverse-translocated or 'backtracked' – has only just been solved and reveals why it is so good at proofreading RNA during transcription.

During pre-translocation, the nucleotide that has just been added is still within the nucleotide addition site of RNA polymerase II. During post-translocation, RNA polymerase II has a free nucleotide addition site that is available to new nucleotides. In addition to these two states, there is the backtracked state, when RNA polymerase II moves backwards over the template, and the 3′ end of the new RNA is extruded. The advantage of backtracking is that it allows the RNA transcript to be checked and is the dominant state when the template is damaged.

Wang et al. 1 used two approaches to produce the backtracked complex. They used RNA–DNA hybrids with mismatched nucleotides at the 3′ ends of the RNA and bound it to polymerase II, thus directly creating the backtracked state. They also used DNA–RNA hybrids with damaged DNA, presuming that the enzyme encountering the damage would retreat to the backtracked state. They found that the structures of both complexes were very similar.

One of the structures solved by Wang et al. is of a hybrid containing one mismatched residue at the 3′ end of the RNA. The authors found that the last correctly matched residue was positioned within the nucleotide addition site and that the mismatched residue is located two residues downstream at a site the authors call 'P', for proofreading. The mismatched residue's interaction with RNA polymerase II distorts the RNA–DNA helix, perhaps producing a structure that is poised for intrinsic cleavage.

With two mismatched residues, the last matched residue and the first mismatched residues are in a location similar to that seen with one mismatched residue. But the second mismatched residues could not be seen in the structure, presumably because they are highly mobile.

Overall, their results lead to two conclusions. The first is that RNA polymerase II backtracked by one residue is stable. This supports the idea that there is an equilibrium between forward and backward motion during transcription. It also confirms that backtracking by one residue is favorable whereas going back over several residues is not.

The second conclusion is that the one-residue backtracked state is readily cleaved in the presence of the elongation factor IIS (TFIIS) and that a dinucleotide is released. This adds weight to the theory that cleavage occurs in the RNA polymerase II active site and that it is important for removal of misincorporated nucleotides.

RNA polymerase II moves forwards and backwards on the template until a mismatch of RNA–DNA causes the helix to distort and shift the polymerase into the backtracked state. If it remains in this state for a long time, cleavage ensues. This one-residue backtracked state is a key contributor to proofreading by RNA polymerase II.

Maria Hodges


  1. D. Wang et al. Structural basis for transcription: Backtracked RNA polymerase II at 3.4 Angstrom resolution.
    Science 324, 1203-1206 (2009).

Structural Biology Knowledgebase ISSN: 1758-1338
Funded by a grant from the National Institute of General Medical Sciences of the National Institutes of Health