PSI Structural Biology Knowledgebase

PSI | Structural Biology Knowledgebase
Header Icons

Related Articles
Community-Nominated Targets
July 2015
Drug Discovery: Solving the Structure of an Anti-hypertension Drug Target
July 2015
Retrospective: 7,000 Structures Closer to Understanding Biology
July 2015
Design and Evolution: Unveiling Translocator Proteins
June 2015
Signaling with DivL
May 2015
Signaling: A Platform for Opposing Functions
May 2015
Signaling: Securing Lipid-Protein Partnership
May 2015
Dynamic DnaK
March 2015
Iron-Sulfur Cluster Biosynthesis
December 2014
Mitochondrion: Flipping for UCP2
December 2014
Mitochondrion: Setting a New TRAP1
December 2014
Power in Numbers
August 2014
Quorum Sensing: A Groovy New Component
August 2014
Quorum Sensing: E. coli Gets Involved
August 2014
iTRAQing the Ubiquitinome
July 2014
Microbiome: The Dynamics of Infection
September 2013
Protein-Nucleic Acid Interaction: A Modified SAM to Modify tRNA
July 2013
Protein-Nucleic Acid Interaction: Versatile Glutamate
July 2013
PDZ Domains
April 2013
Alpha-Catenin Connections
March 2013
Cell-Cell Interaction: A FERM Connection
March 2013
Cell-Cell Interaction: Magic Structure from Microcrystals
March 2013
Cell-Cell Interaction: Modulating Self Recognition Affinity
March 2013
Bacterial Hemophores
January 2013
Archaeal Lipids
December 2012
Membrane Proteome: Capturing Multiple Conformations
December 2012
Lethal Tendencies
October 2012
Symmetry from Asymmetry
October 2012
A signal sensing switch
September 2012
Regulatory insights
September 2012
AlkB Homologs
August 2012
Budding ensemble
August 2012
Targeting Enzyme Function with Structural Genomics
July 2012
The machines behind the spindle assembly checkpoint
June 2012
Chaperone interactions
April 2012
Pilus Assembly Protein TadZ
April 2012
Revealing the Nuclear Pore Complex
March 2012
Topping off the proteasome
March 2012
Twist to open
March 2012
Disordered Proteins
February 2012
Analyzing an allergen
January 2012
Making Lipopolysaccharide
January 2012
Pulling on loose ends
January 2012
Terminal activation
December 2011
The Perils of Protein Secretion
November 2011
Bacterial Armor
October 2011
TLR4 regulation: heads or tails?
October 2011
Ribose production on demand
September 2011
Moving some metal
August 2011
Looking for lipids
July 2011
Ribofuranosyl Binding Protein
June 2011
A molecular switch for neuronal growth
May 2011
Cell wall recycler
May 2011
Added benefits
April 2011
NMR challenges current protein hydration dogma
March 2011
Nitrile Reductase QueF
March 2011
Tip formin
March 2011
Inhibiting factor
February 2011
PASK staying active
February 2011
Tryptophanyl-tRNA Synthetase
February 2011
Regulating nitrogen assimilation
January 2011
Subtle shifts
January 2011
December 2010
Function following form
October 2010
tRNA Isopentenyltransferase MiaA
August 2010
Importance of extension for integrin
June 2010
April 2010
Alg13 Subunit of N-Acetylglucosamine Transferase
February 2010
Hemolysin BL
January 2010
December 2009
Two-component signaling
December 2009
Network coverage
November 2009
Pseudouridine Synthase TruA
November 2009
Unusual cell division
October 2009
Toxin-antitoxin VapBC-5
September 2009
Salicylic Acid Binding Protein 2
August 2009
Proofreading RNA
July 2009
Ykul structure solves bacterial signaling puzzle
July 2009
Hda and DNA Replication
June 2009
Controlling p53
May 2009
Mitotic checkpoint control
May 2009
Ribonuclease and Ribonuclease Inhibitor
April 2009
The elusive helicase
April 2009
March 2009
High-energy storage system
February 2009
A new class of bacterial E3 ubiquitination enzymes
January 2009
Poly(A) RNA recognition
January 2009
Activating BAX
December 2008
Scavenger Decapping Enzyme DcpS
November 2008
Bacteriophage Lambda cII Protein
October 2008
New metal-binding domain
October 2008
Blocking AmtB
September 2008
September 2008
Aspartate Dehydrogenase
August 2008
RNase T
July 2008
May 2008

Research Themes Cell biology

Scavenger Decapping Enzyme DcpS

PSI-SGKB [doi:10.3942/psi_sgkb/fm_2008_11]
Featured System - November 2008
Short description: Messenger RNA molecules are temporary molecules.

Messenger RNA molecules are temporary molecules. They typically last about ten hours in our cells, but this lifespan varies widely between different messages. Some encode proteins with central housekeeping tasks, such as the enzymes of biosynthesis and catabolism, and can last for days in the cytoplasm. Others encode proteins with more time-dependent tasks, such as transcription factors, and last for only minutes before they are destroyed. The amount of a particular messenger RNA is modulated both at the beginning of its life, by controlling the amount that is transcribed from the DNA, and by controlling how fast it is degraded when it is no longer needed.

Degrading and Decapping

Messenger RNA molecules are protected at both of their ends. The front end is protected by a molecular "cap" composed of an oddly-connected, methylated guanine. The tail end of the strand is protected by a long string of adenine nucleotides. Cells use two different pathways to destroy messenger RNA, which use two different approaches to overcome these protections. Both pathways begin when the polyadenine tail is removed from the end of the messenger RNA, but they have different ways of dealing with the cap. One pathway attacks the cap immediately, using a dedicated enzyme to remove the cap and then using an exoribonuclease to chew the strand away one nucleotide at a time, start to finish. The other pathway leaves the cap until the end. First, exosomes clip away nucleotides from the end of the RNA strand. The exosome, however, has trouble finishing its task and leaves a short RNA strand with the capped guanine still intact. This is where the scavenger decapping enzyme DcpS comes in. It takes short, capped oligonucleotides and breaks off the terminal cap, finishing the job of degradation.

Decapping Machine

DcpS is a dimeric protein complex with several moving parts. Each protein chain folds to form two large domains connected by flexible linkers, which then assemble side-by-side to form an enzyme with two active sites, located in the large grooves between the domains. The N-terminal domain, shown at the top here, grips the neighboring subunit with an extensive domain swapped interaction, gluing the entire complex together. When the protein is not bound to substrates, it forms a symmetrical structure, as first revealed in the structure of the mouse DcpS solved by the PSI Joint Centers for Structural Genomics (PDB entry 1vlr, shown at the top).

The Search for Inhibitors...

Structures of DcpS with substrates and with inhibitors have shown that the N-terminal domain rocks back and forth, closing the active site around the substrate on one side, and then opening when the reaction is finished. The first inhibitor structures were recently solved with the help of the PSI Accelerated Technologies Center for Gene to 3D Structure. In these structures, such as PDB entry 3bla shown in the Jmol image below, one active site is closed tightly around an inhibitor molecule, and the other side is trapped in an open, catalytically-incompetent conformation.

...And Drugs

These inhibitors were found as part of a targetted search for drugs to fight spinal muscular atrophy. This disease is the most common cause of hereditary infant death, and is caused by defects in the SMN1 gene. Surprisingly, there is a second gene, SMN2, that can substitute for the SMN1 gene if it is activated over its normal levels. It was found that these inhibitors activate the SMN2 gene by blocking the action of DcpS, ultimately leading to increased levels of SMN messenger RNA.

The JSmol tab below displays an interactive JSmol.

CBS Domain Protein TA0289

TA0289 is a dimer of identical subunits. The two CBS domains, colored darker blue here, link the two chains together. The two zinc ribbon domains, colored turquoise, extend on opposite sides of the complex. The four cysteine amino acids in each zinc ribbon, whose sulfur atoms are represented as yellow spheres, coordinate an iron atom, shown here as a reddish sphere.


  1. Singh J, Salcius M, Liu SW, Staker BL, Mishra R, Thurmond J, Michaud G, Mattoon DR, Printen J, Christensen J, Bjornsson JM, Pollok BA, Kiledjian M, Stewart L, Jarecki J, Gurney ME. (2008) DcpS as a Therapeutic Target for Spinal Muscular Atrophy. ACS Chemical Biology, epub ahead of print.

  2. Han GW, Schwarzenbacher R, McMullan D, Abdubek P, Ambing E, Axelrod H, Biorac T, Canaves JM, Chiu HJ, Dai X, Deacon AM, DiDonato M, Elsliger MA, Godzik A, Grittini C, Grzechnik SK, Hale J, Hampton E, Haugen J, Hornsby M, Jaroszewski L, Klock HE, Koesema E, Kreusch A, Kuhn P, Lesley SA, McPhillips TM, Miller MD, Moy K, Nigoghossian E, Paulsen J, Quijano K, Reyes R, Spraggon G, Stevens RC, van den Bedem H, Velasquez J, Vincent J, White A, Wolf G, Xu Q, Hodgson KO, Wooley J, Wilson IA. (2005) Crystal Structure of an Apo mRNA Decapping Enzyme (DcpS) from Mouse at 1.83 A Resolution. Proteins 60, 797-802.

  3. Liu H, Kiledjian M (2006) Decapping the Message: A Beginning or an End. Biochemical Society Transactions 34, 35-38.

Structural Biology Knowledgebase ISSN: 1758-1338
Funded by a grant from the National Institute of General Medical Sciences of the National Institutes of Health